METHODOLOGY
After defining its charge, Task Force members concluded that the data-gathering
portion of its work would be crucial.
It would be critical to start the project with a thorough knowledge
of the existing practices of the retirement systems and develop recommendations
based on the empirical data.
It was agreed that the best way to achieve this goal would
be through a statewide survey of all Connecticut municipalities who
sponsored retirement plans for their employees.
The survey was largely based on one prepared by the Public Pension Coordinating
Council
, with modifications made by Milliman & Robertson, members of the
Task Force, and staff. It
was divided into the following five sections:
I - Introduction
II - Plan Benefits
III - Actuarial Analysis
IV - Plan Funding and Contributions
V - Investment Information.
The survey was mailed to the Chief Financial Officers of Connecticut municipalities
who were asked to complete one survey for each plan sponsored by the
municipality or tax district. The level of response was significantly
higher than had been anticipated.
The information gleaned from the survey responses was used
by Milliman and Robertson to create a database.
The Task Force conducted a public hearing on innovative and fiscally sound
practices used to mitigate unfunded pension liabilities.
The public hearing was well attended, and provided Task Force
members with the opportunity to hear testimony from various bond counsel,
investment bankers, financial advisors, and the Treasurer of the State
of Connecticut, the Honorable Christopher Burnham.
Although it sought “innovative practices”, the public hearing mainly provided
the Task Force with information regarding the issuance of pension
obligation bonds. The consensus of those testifying seemed to be that clear
statutory authority to issue pension obligation bonds in Connecticut
does not presently exist; the Task Force should consider offering
Connecticut municipalities the opportunity to use this funding mechanism
as an option, but only under certain conditions.
After reviewing the testimony, Task Force members agreed that it would
be beneficial to understand the positions of the rating agencies on
the issuance of these bonds.
They also sought the investors’ perspective on the issuance
of pension related debt. The facts gathered at the public hearing and the subsequent
meetings with rating agencies and investors form the basis of the
Task Force’s findings and recommendations in this area.
The Task Force made a presentation to the Connecticut Government Finance
Officers Association (GFOA) of its preliminary findings. This generated more interest in the work of the Task Force.
In addition to gathering information through the methods mentioned above,
Task Force members were also provided with a large amount of reading
material on the management of public sector retirement systems. The topic of Pension Obligation Bonds is very much in the
news, as different states are investigating this option as a possible
solution to their funding problems.
Members were provided with many articles pertaining to this
issue.
Next